Talk: Main Page

Rules on this talk page

Only administrators may edit this section

• This is not a place for arguments.
• This is the place for voting proposals only.
  • To vote for policy proposals, visit this page.
  • To vote for nomination and demotion of user right, visit this page.
  • This is not a place to talk to other users. To chat, visit the chat room. You can also send messages in their user talk page.
• You can't vote on your own proposal.
• If you support a proposal, use Support — (under the name {{Support}} with your reason and signature)
• If you oppose a proposal, use Oppose — (under the name {{Oppose}} with your reason and signature).
• If you are neutral with a proposal, use Neutral — (under the name {{Neutral}} with your reason and signature).
• When you see Approved — (under the name {{Approved}} signed with the admin's name), it means the proposal is accepted.
• When you see Denied - (under the name {{Denied}} signed with the admin's name), it means the proposal is denied.
• Do not delete, change or strike out (like this) someone else's vote. You can only delete or change your own votes.

Comments

I don't like Articles having Comment sections. The replying system gets all weird, and it all goes very messy when you have multiple users talking to one another. This is why I propose, to the other Admins, that we remove Comments from Articles, and return to talk pages, which are easier to reply on.

Talking with comments:

User1: This page sucks

• User2: No it doesn't

• User3: I agree

There is now some confusion as to what view the hypothetical User3 has. With talk pages, it is obvious:

User1: This page sucks

• User2: No it doesn'
  • User3: I agree

Which is why I believe we should go to talk pages, not comments.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Local Mafia Boss (talk • contribs • blog) at 19:50,9/15/2019 (UTC)

Additional information

Ismael, you can do that on talk pages. Objection overuled, and negative vote nullified

Votes (+1)

Oppose — I believe it should be kept because it gives feedback and the opinions on the ideas on the article, Ismael Perez (Talk) 23:59, January 11, 2014 (UTC)

This can be found indirectly on a talkpage by clicking on the 'talk page' button.90.244.84.59 14:47, January 15, 2014 (UTC)

Oppose — I think the comments function is better, although it does indeed have its flaws. For map games, a page can be created. DaneOfTheNorth (talk) 19:06, January 12, 2014 (UTC)

Support —  I am for this because with the fourms working the way they do you can have it both ways. so why not?

Wingman1 05:07, January 14, 2014 (UTC)

Support — The list of comment boxes look scruffy, I prefer the more professional 'Wikipeadia look' and style of a talk page.The River Nile-2 (talk) 02:23, January 15, 2014 (UTC)

Support —  Comments look ugly and dont function well for articles. Profile ^{(Hail Marius•Something that should never happen)}

Final results

Approved — Ismael Perez (Talk) 23:08, January 16, 2014 (UTC)

Comments

Ismael, it is still an irrelevant and incorrect objection, and has been removed Local Mafia Boss (Talk) (Blog)

They look more snappy and gosh!Oniontree1 (talk) 02:30, July 28, 2015 (UTC)

Modify category listing

I think the listing of categories should be modified so it's not an exactly copy from Future Wiki. DaneOfTheNorth (talk) 13:42, February 6, 2014 (UTC)

Yeh. Whipsnade (talk) 19:17, September 11, 2014 (UTC)

Ratings

Oniontree1 (talk) 02:32, July 28, 2015 (UTC)