Alternate Future Wiki

Rules on this talk page

Only administrators may edit this section

  • This is not a place for arguments.
  • This is the place for voting proposals only.
    • To vote for policy proposals, visit this page.
    • To vote for nomination and demotion of user right, visit this page.
    • This is not a place to talk to other users. To chat, visit the chat room. You can also send messages in their user talk page.
  • You can't vote on your own proposal.
  • If you support a proposal, use Support.jpg Support — (under the name {{Support}} with your reason and signature)
  • If you oppose a proposal, use Oppose.jpg Oppose — (under the name {{Oppose}} with your reason and signature).
  • If you are neutral with a proposal, use Neutral.jpg Neutral — (under the name {{Neutral}} with your reason and signature).
  • When you see Keep.jpg Approved — (under the name {{Approved}} signed with the admin's name), it means the proposal is accepted.
  • When you see Delete.jpg Denied - (under the name {{Denied}} signed with the admin's name), it means the proposal is denied.
  • Do not delete, change or strike out (like this) someone else's vote. You can only delete or change your own votes.


I don't like Articles having Comment sections. The replying system gets all weird, and it all goes very messy when you have multiple users talking to one another. This is why I propose, to the other Admins, that we remove Comments from Articles, and return to talk pages, which are easier to reply on.

Talking with comments:

User1: This page sucks

  • User2: No it doesn't
  • User3: I agree

There is now some confusion as to what view the hypothetical User3 has. With talk pages, it is obvious:

User1: This page sucks

  • User2: No it doesn'
    • User3: I agree

Which is why I believe we should go to talk pages, not comments.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Local Mafia Boss (talkcontribsblog) at 14:48,6/15/2022 (UTC)

Additional information

Ismael, you can do that on talk pages. Objection overuled, and negative vote nullified

Votes (+1)

Oppose.jpg Oppose — I believe it should be kept because it gives feedback and the opinions on the ideas on the article, Ismael Perez (Talk) 23:59, January 11, 2014 (UTC)

This can be found indirectly on a talkpage by clicking on the 'talk page' button. 14:47, January 15, 2014 (UTC)

Oppose.jpg Oppose — I think the comments function is better, although it does indeed have its flaws. For map games, a page can be created. DaneOfTheNorth (talk) 19:06, January 12, 2014 (UTC)

Support.jpg Support —  I am for this because with the fourms working the way they do you can have it both ways. so why not?

Temp.png Wingman1 05:07, January 14, 2014 (UTC)

Support.jpg Support — The list of comment boxes look scruffy, I prefer the more professional 'Wikipeadia look' and style of a talk page.The River Nile-2 (talk) 02:23, January 15, 2014 (UTC)

Support.jpg Support —  Comments look ugly and dont function well for articles. Profile (Hail MariusSomething that should never happen)

Final results

Keep.jpg ApprovedIsmael Perez (Talk) 23:08, January 16, 2014 (UTC)


Ismael, it is still an irrelevant and incorrect objection, and has been removed Local Mafia Boss (Talk) (Blog)

They look more snappy and gosh!Oniontree1 (talk) 02:30, July 28, 2015 (UTC)

Modify category listing

I think the listing of categories should be modified so it's not an exactly copy from Future Wiki. DaneOfTheNorth (talk) 13:42, February 6, 2014 (UTC)

Yeh. Whipsnade (talk) 19:17, September 11, 2014 (UTC)


Date Views Edits Photos
Totals 896 133 31
See more stats
Jul 27 92 0 0
Jul 26 119 13 2
Jul 25 123 4 0
Jul 24 289 47 0
Jul 23 138 28 4
Jul 22 50 11 8
Jul 21 85 30 17

Oniontree1 (talk) 02:32, July 28, 2015 (UTC)