Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
{{Oppose}} I believe it should be kept because it gives feedback and the opinions on the ideas on the article, '''[[User:Ismael777|Ismael Perez]]''' ([[User talk:Ismael777|Talk]]) 23:59, January 11, 2014 (UTC) |
{{Oppose}} I believe it should be kept because it gives feedback and the opinions on the ideas on the article, '''[[User:Ismael777|Ismael Perez]]''' ([[User talk:Ismael777|Talk]]) 23:59, January 11, 2014 (UTC) |
||
− | Ismael, you can do that on talk pages. Objection overuled |
+ | Ismael, you can do that on talk pages. Objection overuled, and negative vote nullified {{Local Sig}} {{Support}} |
====Final results==== |
====Final results==== |
||
No final results yet. |
No final results yet. |
Revision as of 11:57, 12 January 2014
Comments
I don't like Articles having Comment sections. The replying system gets all weird, and it all goes very messy when you have multiple users talking to one another. This is why I propose, to the other Admins, that we remove Comments from Articles, and return to talk pages, which are easier to reply on.
Talking with comments:
User1: This page sucks
- User2: No it doesn't
- User3: I agree
There is now some confusion as to what view the hypothetical User3 has. With talk pages, it is obvious:
User1: This page sucks
- User2: No it doesn'
- User3: I agree
Which is why I believe we should go to talk pages, not comments.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Local Mafia Boss (talk • contribs • blog) at 03:35,4/19/2024 (UTC)
Votes (-1)
Oppose — I believe it should be kept because it gives feedback and the opinions on the ideas on the article, Ismael Perez (Talk) 23:59, January 11, 2014 (UTC)
Ismael, you can do that on talk pages. Objection overuled, and negative vote nullified Local Mafia Boss (Talk) (Blog) Support —
Final results
No final results yet.