Alternate Future Wiki
Line 20: Line 20:
 
{{Oppose}} I believe it should be kept because it gives feedback and the opinions on the ideas on the article, '''[[User:Ismael777|Ismael Perez]]''' ([[User talk:Ismael777|Talk]]) 23:59, January 11, 2014 (UTC)
 
{{Oppose}} I believe it should be kept because it gives feedback and the opinions on the ideas on the article, '''[[User:Ismael777|Ismael Perez]]''' ([[User talk:Ismael777|Talk]]) 23:59, January 11, 2014 (UTC)
   
Ismael, you can do that on talk pages. Objection overuled. {{Local Sig}}
+
Ismael, you can do that on talk pages. Objection overuled, and negative vote nullified {{Local Sig}} {{Support}}
 
====Final results====
 
====Final results====
 
No final results yet.
 
No final results yet.

Revision as of 11:57, 12 January 2014

Comments

I don't like Articles having Comment sections. The replying system gets all weird, and it all goes very messy when you have multiple users talking to one another. This is why I propose, to the other Admins, that we remove Comments from Articles, and return to talk pages, which are easier to reply on.

Talking with comments:

User1: This page sucks

  • User2: No it doesn't
  • User3: I agree

There is now some confusion as to what view the hypothetical User3 has. With talk pages, it is obvious:

User1: This page sucks

  • User2: No it doesn'
    • User3: I agree

Which is why I believe we should go to talk pages, not comments.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Local Mafia Boss (talkcontribsblog) at 03:35,4/19/2024 (UTC)

Votes (-1)

Oppose Oppose — I believe it should be kept because it gives feedback and the opinions on the ideas on the article, Ismael Perez (Talk) 23:59, January 11, 2014 (UTC)

Ismael, you can do that on talk pages. Objection overuled, and negative vote nullified Local Mafia Boss (Talk) (Blog) Support Support

Final results

No final results yet.

Comments