| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
===Additional information=== |
===Additional information=== |
||
Ismael, you can do that on talk pages. Objection overuled, and negative vote nullified |
Ismael, you can do that on talk pages. Objection overuled, and negative vote nullified |
||
| − | ===Votes ( |
+ | ===Votes (0)=== |
| − | {{Oppose}} I believe it should be kept because it gives feedback and the opinions on the ideas on the article, '''[[User:Ismael777|Ismael Perez]]''' ([[User talk:Ismael777|Talk]]) 23:59, January 11, 2014 (UTC) |
+ | <s>{{Oppose}} I believe it should be kept because it gives feedback and the opinions on the ideas on the article, '''[[User:Ismael777|Ismael Perez]]''' ([[User talk:Ismael777|Talk]]) 23:59, January 11, 2014 (UTC)</s> |
{{Oppose}} I think the comments function is better, although it does indeed have its flaws. For map games, a page can be created. [[User:Daneofscandinavy|<span style="color:#FF0000;">'''DaneOf'''</span><span style="color:#0000FF;">'''TheNorth'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Daneofscandinavy|talk]]) 19:06, January 12, 2014 (UTC) |
{{Oppose}} I think the comments function is better, although it does indeed have its flaws. For map games, a page can be created. [[User:Daneofscandinavy|<span style="color:#FF0000;">'''DaneOf'''</span><span style="color:#0000FF;">'''TheNorth'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Daneofscandinavy|talk]]) 19:06, January 12, 2014 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 14:22, 14 January 2014
Comments
I don't like Articles having Comment sections. The replying system gets all weird, and it all goes very messy when you have multiple users talking to one another. This is why I propose, to the other Admins, that we remove Comments from Articles, and return to talk pages, which are easier to reply on.
Talking with comments:
User1: This page sucks
- User2: No it doesn't
- User3: I agree
There is now some confusion as to what view the hypothetical User3 has. With talk pages, it is obvious:
User1: This page sucks
- User2: No it doesn'
- User3: I agree
Which is why I believe we should go to talk pages, not comments.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Local Mafia Boss (talk • contribs • blog) at 07:33,4/19/2024 (UTC)
Additional information
Ismael, you can do that on talk pages. Objection overuled, and negative vote nullified
Votes (0)
Oppose — I believe it should be kept because it gives feedback and the opinions on the ideas on the article, Ismael Perez (Talk) 23:59, January 11, 2014 (UTC)
Oppose — I think the comments function is better, although it does indeed have its flaws. For map games, a page can be created. DaneOfTheNorth (talk) 19:06, January 12, 2014 (UTC)
Support — I am for this because with the fourms working the way they do you can have it both ways. so why not?
Wingman1 05:07, January 14, 2014 (UTC)
Final results
No final results yet.
Comments
Ismael, it is still an irrelevant and incorrect objection, and has been removed Local Mafia Boss (Talk) (Blog)