Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
===Votes (0)=== |
===Votes (0)=== |
||
{{Oppose}} I believe it should be kept because it gives feedback and the opinions on the ideas on the article, '''[[User:Ismael777|Ismael Perez]]''' ([[User talk:Ismael777|Talk]]) 23:59, January 11, 2014 (UTC) |
{{Oppose}} I believe it should be kept because it gives feedback and the opinions on the ideas on the article, '''[[User:Ismael777|Ismael Perez]]''' ([[User talk:Ismael777|Talk]]) 23:59, January 11, 2014 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | This can be found indirectly on a talkpage by clicking on the 'talk page' button.[[Special:Contributions/90.244.84.59|90.244.84.59]] 14:47, January 15, 2014 (UTC) |
||
{{Oppose}} I think the comments function is better, although it does indeed have its flaws. For map games, a page can be created. [[User:Daneofscandinavy|<span style="color:#FF0000;">'''DaneOf'''</span><span style="color:#0000FF;">'''TheNorth'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Daneofscandinavy|talk]]) 19:06, January 12, 2014 (UTC) |
{{Oppose}} I think the comments function is better, although it does indeed have its flaws. For map games, a page can be created. [[User:Daneofscandinavy|<span style="color:#FF0000;">'''DaneOf'''</span><span style="color:#0000FF;">'''TheNorth'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Daneofscandinavy|talk]]) 19:06, January 12, 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:47, 15 January 2014
Comments
I don't like Articles having Comment sections. The replying system gets all weird, and it all goes very messy when you have multiple users talking to one another. This is why I propose, to the other Admins, that we remove Comments from Articles, and return to talk pages, which are easier to reply on.
Talking with comments:
User1: This page sucks
- User2: No it doesn't
- User3: I agree
There is now some confusion as to what view the hypothetical User3 has. With talk pages, it is obvious:
User1: This page sucks
- User2: No it doesn'
- User3: I agree
Which is why I believe we should go to talk pages, not comments.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Local Mafia Boss (talk • contribs • blog) at 09:06,4/19/2024 (UTC)
Additional information
Ismael, you can do that on talk pages. Objection overuled, and negative vote nullified
Votes (0)
Oppose — I believe it should be kept because it gives feedback and the opinions on the ideas on the article, Ismael Perez (Talk) 23:59, January 11, 2014 (UTC)
This can be found indirectly on a talkpage by clicking on the 'talk page' button.90.244.84.59 14:47, January 15, 2014 (UTC)
Oppose — I think the comments function is better, although it does indeed have its flaws. For map games, a page can be created. DaneOfTheNorth (talk) 19:06, January 12, 2014 (UTC)
Support — I am for this because with the fourms working the way they do you can have it both ways. so why not?
Wingman1 05:07, January 14, 2014 (UTC)
Support — The list of comment boxes look scruffy, I prefer the more professional 'Wikipeadia look' and style of a talk page.The River Nile-2 (talk) 02:23, January 15, 2014 (UTC)
Support — Comments look ugly and dont function well for articles. Profile (Hail Marius•Something that should never happen)
Final results
No final results yet.
Comments
Ismael, it is still an irrelevant and incorrect objection, and has been removed Local Mafia Boss (Talk) (Blog)