Talk:Main Page

Rules on this talk page

Only administrators may edit this section

• This is not a place for arguments.
• This is the place for voting proposals only.
  • To vote for policy proposals, visit this page.
  • To vote for nomination and demotion of user right, visit this page.
  • This is not a place to talk to other users. To chat, visit the chat room. You can also send messages in their user talk page.
• You can't vote on your own proposal.
• If you support a proposal, use Support — (under the name {{Support}} with your reason and signature)
• If you oppose a proposal, use Oppose — (under the name {{Oppose}} with your reason and signature).
• If you are neutral with a proposal, use Neutral — (under the name {{Neutral}} with your reason and signature).
• When you see Approved — (under the name {{Approved}} signed with the admin's name), it means the proposal is accepted.
• When you see Denied - (under the name {{Denied}} signed with the admin's name), it means the proposal is denied.
• Do not delete, change or strike out (like this) someone else's vote. You can only delete or change your own votes.

Comments

I don't like Articles having Comment sections. The replying system gets all weird, and it all goes very messy when you have multiple users talking to one another. This is why I propose, to the other Admins, that we remove Comments from Articles, and return to talk pages, which are easier to reply on.

Talking with comments:

User1: This page sucks

• User2: No it doesn't

• User3: I agree

There is now some confusion as to what view the hypothetical User3 has. With talk pages, it is obvious:

User1: This page sucks

• User2: No it doesn'
  • User3: I agree

Which is why I believe we should go to talk pages, not comments.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Local Mafia Boss (talk • contribs • blog) at 09:08,4/19/2024 (UTC)

Additional information

Ismael, you can do that on talk pages. Objection overuled, and negative vote nullified

Votes (+1)

Oppose — I believe it should be kept because it gives feedback and the opinions on the ideas on the article, Ismael Perez (Talk) 23:59, January 11, 2014 (UTC)

This can be found indirectly on a talkpage by clicking on the 'talk page' button.90.244.84.59 14:47, January 15, 2014 (UTC)

Oppose — I think the comments function is better, although it does indeed have its flaws. For map games, a page can be created. DaneOfTheNorth (talk) 19:06, January 12, 2014 (UTC)

Support —  I am for this because with the fourms working the way they do you can have it both ways. so why not?

Wingman1 05:07, January 14, 2014 (UTC)

Support — The list of comment boxes look scruffy, I prefer the more professional 'Wikipeadia look' and style of a talk page.The River Nile-2 (talk) 02:23, January 15, 2014 (UTC)

Support —  Comments look ugly and dont function well for articles. Profile ^{(Hail Marius•Something that should never happen)}

Final results

Approved — Ismael Perez (Talk) 23:08, January 16, 2014 (UTC)

Comments

Ismael, it is still an irrelevant and incorrect objection, and has been removed Local Mafia Boss (Talk) (Blog)

You Have

AIDS