Rules on this talk page
Only administrators may edit this section
- This is not a place for arguments.
- You can't vote on your own proposal.
- If you support a proposal, use
Support — (under the name {{Support}} with your reason and signature) - If you oppose a proposal, use
Oppose — (under the name {{Oppose}} with your reason and signature). - If you are neutral with a proposal, use
Neutral — (under the name {{Neutral}} with your reason and signature). - Do not delete, change or strike out (
like this) someone else's vote. You can only delete or change your own votes.
Comments
I don't like Articles having Comment sections. The replying system gets all weird, and it all goes very messy when you have multiple users talking to one another. This is why I propose, to the other Admins, that we remove Comments from Articles, and return to talk pages, which are easier to reply on.
Talking with comments:
User1: This page sucks
- User2: No it doesn't
- User3: I agree
There is now some confusion as to what view the hypothetical User3 has. With talk pages, it is obvious:
User1: This page sucks
- User2: No it doesn'
- User3: I agree
Which is why I believe we should go to talk pages, not comments.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Local Mafia Boss (talk • contribs • blog) at 08:13,4/19/2024 (UTC)
Additional information
Ismael, you can do that on talk pages. Objection overuled, and negative vote nullified
Votes (+1)
Oppose — I believe it should be kept because it gives feedback and the opinions on the ideas on the article, Ismael Perez (Talk) 23:59, January 11, 2014 (UTC)
This can be found indirectly on a talkpage by clicking on the 'talk page' button.90.244.84.59 14:47, January 15, 2014 (UTC)
Oppose — I think the comments function is better, although it does indeed have its flaws. For map games, a page can be created. DaneOfTheNorth (talk) 19:06, January 12, 2014 (UTC)
Support — I am for this because with the fourms working the way they do you can have it both ways. so why not?
Wingman1 05:07, January 14, 2014 (UTC)
Support — The list of comment boxes look scruffy, I prefer the more professional 'Wikipeadia look' and style of a talk page.The River Nile-2 (talk) 02:23, January 15, 2014 (UTC)
Support — Comments look ugly and dont function well for articles. Profile (Hail Marius•Something that should never happen)
Final results
Approved — Ismael Perez (Talk) 23:08, January 16, 2014 (UTC)
Comments
Ismael, it is still an irrelevant and incorrect objection, and has been removed Local Mafia Boss (Talk) (Blog)